Advocates Rally To Push For Pa. To Do Away With Property Tax

For Pennsylvania lawmakers who see the state’s rising property taxes as an intolerable burden on the state’s fixed-income residents, Feb. 3 was a day to try to rally support for repealing the taxes.

It was also a day to lament the previous efforts that have failed to bear fruit.

A number of state senators and representatives took part in a rally Monday on the Capitol rotunda steps calling on their colleagues to pass legislation that would do away with property taxes in the state and find alternate sources to fund education.

Several methods have been suggested over the years for replacing the property tax source, such as a combination of income and sales tax hikes. But education sector advocates have generally opposed such moves because property taxes provide a revenue stream that reliably increases every year.

“Many of us feel like Bill Murray here in the Capitol, living and reliving ‘Groundhog Day,’ every single day on this issue,” state Sen. Kristin Phillips-Hill, R-Jacobus, said. “When I tell people I want to see action on this issue, it isn't lip service. It is the single most important issue for the people of York County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.”

Phillips-Hill recalled that in 2015, a property tax elimination bill nearly passed in the Senate, failing on a tie vote. In the years since, new proposals have continued to arise, but none have made it even that far.

“The school property tax is the single most unfair tax in our Commonwealth,” she said. “And unlike the income or sales tax, it is in no way based on one’s ability to pay. … And … we see that tragic news of homeowners losing their homes because they just can't pay their taxes. That home could be paid off, but because of regressive school property taxes, they're losing their homes.”

Opposition

Rep. Doyle Heffley, R-Weissport, who noted that the county he represents, Carbon County, has been hit particularly hard by high property taxes, argued that an array of powerful organizations were lined up to oppose any legislation that would do away with the tax.

“Let me tell you, almost every church organization in the state of Pennsylvania is opposed to property tax elimination,” he said. “Go to your churches and ask them why. Almost every organized labor [union] in the state of Pennsylvania is opposed to property tax elimination, the chamber, every organization. … Check to see where the money's going that you're sending to these organizations, because it's coming, and they're using it against us because we're supporting the belief that we can eliminate property taxes.”

Reassessment

Reassessments and the consequent rise in property taxes can serve as a disincentive to make improvements to one’s home, Rep. Mark Gillen, R-Reading, argued. He said that eliminating the tax could lead to a home renovation boom that would have positive ripple effects for local economies.

“I think sometimes we fail to phrase this in moral terms, you know, there's right and there's wrong,” Gillen said. “To drive somebody out of their castle is wrong.”

Noting that there will be an election in the House of Representatives within the next year to replace retiring Speaker Mike Turzai, Gillen went so far as to say that the next speaker would need to commit to repealing property taxes in order to earn his support.

“I'm drawing a line in the sand,” he said. “If you want to be the speaker of the House and you want my vote – I don't care whether the vote is 200 to one. … If you want my vote, then you need to indicate that you are going to advance property tax legislation in the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, or I won't vote for you for speaker of the House.”

To Sen. Doug Mastriano, R-Chambersburg, the property tax is a blight on the freedoms of Pennsylvania residents.

“I say we're not a free people, and property tax needs to go,” he said “It's a socialist system that's crushing our elderly and breaking the backs of our working class. Every time I turn around, there's another scheme to take money out of our wallets or to put more regulations on our back. How long can we take it?”